The Archaeobotanical Studies of Tepe Taleb Khan Sistan Southeast of Iran (2500-2300 BCE) - Journal of Research on Archaeometry
year 6, Issue 1 (2020)                   JRA 2020, 6(1): 137-154 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kavosh H A, Shirazi Z, Naseri R. The Archaeobotanical Studies of Tepe Taleb Khan, Sistan, Southeast of Iran (2500-2300 BCE). JRA. 2020; 6 (1) :137-154
1- Zabol University
2- Shahr i Sokhta World Heritage laboratory ,
Abstract:   (865 Views)
In the third millennium B.C., the inhabitable zones in the southern part of Sistan Plain were confined to the deltaic lands around the Rud-i Biyaban River. One of the main climatological characteristics of that time was the abundance of water resources in the Hilmand basin. The formation and dynamism of human settlements in this region have always been related to the water fluctuations of the Hilmand River, so that a shift in the water courses has always led to changes in human agglomerations. The main purposes of this research are first of all, to find out more about the vegetation around Tepe Taleb Khan and second, to provide more information on the use of these vegetal resources by the local inhabitants in that era. Two phases of archaeobotanical analysis are included in this research: namely field operation (sampling and extracting techniques of plant remains), and laboratory studies on the data coming from the sixth season of archaeological excavations at Tepe Taleb Khan. These studies have been done on the plant remains obtained from 25 samples related to various archaeological contexts such as soil deposit, ashy layer, burnt soil, fireplaces and their contents, plaster and soil deposit, msoil and debris deposit, soil and ash deposit, mudbrick debris and floor (dated back to the third millennium BCE/2500-2300 BCE). By flotation of 316 liter of sediments, collected from these contexts, approximately 1900 mL plant remains including seeds, rachis segments, fruits and charcoals were extracted. The carpological studies on 2045 seeds, rachis segments and fruits, led to the identification of various vegetal groups with different relative frequencies in the archaeological contexts including cultivated plants (such as cereals, oil seeds, fruits, cucurbits, cultivated pulses) and non-cultivated plants (like wild fruits, wild pulses, wild grasses and wild plants). The results indicated the presence of different crops such as emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccum), free threshing wheat (T. durum/aestivum),  bread wheat (T. aestivum), club wheat (T. compactum), spelt (T. spelt), free threshing barley (Hordeum vulgare var.nudum), lentil (Lens culinaris), vetches (Vicia), vetchlings (Lathyrus), pea (Pisum sativum), flax (Linum usitatissimum), grape (Vitis vinifera) and cucurbits (cucurbitaceae), testifying a subsistence economy based on agriculture. At the same time, anthracological studies done on 948 charcoal fragments led to the identification of diffrent trees and shrubs like goosefoots (Chenopodiaceae), tamaris (Tamarix sp.), palm (Phoenix dactylifera) and poplar (Populus sp.). According to the previous archaeobotanical evidence at Shahr-i Sokhta, these taxa are present in the anthracological spectra of the Bronze Age vegetation of the southern Sistan Plain. Based on the archaeobotanical data, Tepe Taleb Khan inhabitants used goosefoots and tamaris wood to meet their fuel needs due to the soft texture and rapid flammability of these species. Nowadays, due to the unfavorable environmental conditions of Sistan, tamaris and goosefoots (as xeric and halophytic plants) are the dominant species in the region. The continued presence of these plants from the third millennium B.C., up to now indicates more or less the durability of ecological conditions in the region. The poorness of current vegetation in Sistan has undoubtedly been influenced by environmental and human factors over the time.
Full-Text [PDF 1749 kb]   (170 Downloads)    
Technical Note: Original Research | Subject: Archaeometry
Received: 2020/01/27 | Accepted: 2020/06/18 | Published: 2020/06/30 | ePublished: 2020/06/30

1. Mehrafarin R, Sajjadi M. S. Effects of hydrology and geographical environment on ancient settlements in Zahak region of Sistan, Journal of Spatial Planning. 2005; 9(1): p. 217-239. [in Persian] [مهرآفرین رضا، سیدسجادی سیدمنصور. تأثیر هیدرولوژی و محیط جغرافیایی بر استقرارهای باستانی حوزه زهک سیستان، فصلنامه مدرس علوم انسانی- برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، 1384؛ 9(1): ص. 239-217.]
2. Costantini L, Costantini Biasini L. Agriculture in Baluchistan between the 7th and the 3rd Millennium B. C. Newsletter of Baluchistan Studies. 1985(2):16-30.
3. Costantini L. Wood remains from Shahr-i Sokhta: a source of information for the ancient environment and technology in photohistoric Sistan. InSouth Asian Archaeology 1977 (pp. 87-121).
4. Costantini L. Introductory note on burnt wood residues from Shahr-i Sokhta, Iran. East and West. 1977 Dec 1;27(1/4):105-110.
5. Tucci GI, BASAGLIA P. La città bruciata del deserto salato: testi di Basaglia...[et al.]. Erizzo; 1977.
6. Shirazi Z. Vegetal resources of southern Sistan during the third millennium BC, based on the archaeobotanical evidence at Shahr-i Sokhta.In: M. S. Seyyed Sajjadi and E. Ascalone (eds). 2019. [in persian] [شیرازی زهره. منابع گیاهی جنوب دشت سیستان در هزاره سوم پیش از میلاد بر اساس بقایای گیاهی به‌دست‌آمده از شهر سوخته. در مجموعه مقالات شهر سوخته 2. به کوشش سیدمنصور سیدسجادی و انریکو آسکالونه. انتشارت پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی و گردشگری؛ 1398.]
7. Karami M. Kavosh H. A., Ghasemi M., Miri M. Typology and classification of Tappe Taleb Khan potteries in Sistan, based on comparative studies with adjacent areas [in:] "proceeding of international congress of young archaeologist", M. H. A. Kharanaghi., M. Khanipoor., R. Naseri (eds.), Tehran: Iranology Foundation, 2018: p. 367-382. [in Persian] [کرمی محبوبه، کاوش حسین‏علی، قاسمی محسن و میری مهدی. گونه‏شناسی و طبقه‌بندی سفال‌های تپۀ طالب‌خان سیستان بر اساس مطالعۀ تطبیقی با مناطق هم‌جوار، در مجموعه مقالات همایش بین‌المللی باستان‌شناسان جوان (جلد اول)، به کوشش: محمدحسین عزیزی خرانقی، مرتضی خانی پور، رضا ناصری، بنیاد ایران‌شناسی، 1397؛ ص. 382-367.]
8. Biscione RA. The Burnt Building of Period Shahr-i Sokhta IV. An Attempt of Functional Analysis from the Distribution of Pottery Types. Seminario di studi asiatici, series minor. 1979;10:291-306.
9. Kavosh H. A. Southern Plain of Sistan During Bronze Age (doctoral dissertation), Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. (2012). [in persian] [کاوش حسین‏علی. دشت جنوبی سیستان در عصر مفرغ. پایان‌نامه دکتری، دانشگاه تهران؛ 1391.]
10. Ghanavati F, Moradi F, Mozaffari J. Plant dictionary of Sistan and Baluchestan province. Agriculture organization of Sistan and Baluchestan province. Management of education and popular participation; 2004. [in Persian] [قنواتی فرنگیس، مرادی فؤاد و مظفری جواد. فرهنگ گیاهان استان سیستان و بلوچستان. سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان سیستان و بلوچستان. مدیریت ترویج و مشارکت مردمی 1382.]
11. Meadow R. H. "The geographical and palaeoenvironmental setting of Tepe Yahya (Ch. 3)". In: C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky ET T. W. BEAL (éds.) Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran 1967-1975. The early periods. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge MA, 1986: p. 21-38.
12. Tengberg M. L'exploitation et utilisation des plantes dans les confins indo-iraniens du Chalcolithique à l'âge du Bronze selon les recherches archéobotaniques, In: Y. Madjidzadeh (éd.), First International Conference of Archaeological Research in Jiroft 2004. Cultural Heritage, Handicraft and Tourism Organization of Kermân Province, International Centre for Archaeological Research of Southeast Region, Jiroft. 2008: p. 169-179.
13. Mashkour M, Tengberg M, Shirazi Z, Madjidzadeh Y. Bio-archaeological studies at Konar Sandal, Halil Rud basin, southeastern Iran. Environmental Archaeology. 2013 Oct 1;18(3):222-46. [DOI:10.1179/1749631413Y.0000000006]
14. Shirazi R, Shirazi Z. Vegetation Dynamic of Southern Sistan during the Bronze Age: Anthracological Studies at Shahr-i Sokhta. Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies. 2012 Sep 1;2(1):27-38.
15. Vaezi A, Ghazban F, Tavakoli V, Routh J, Beni AN, Bianchi TS, Curtis JH, Kylin H. A Late Pleistocene-Holocene multi-proxy record of climate variability in the Jazmurian playa, southeastern Iran. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2019 Jan 15;514:754-67. [DOI:10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.09.026]
16. Hamzeh MA, Mahmudy-Gharaie MH, Alizadeh-Lahijani H, Moussavi-Harami R, Djamali M, Naderi-Beni A. Paleolimnology of Lake Hamoun (E Iran): implication for past climate changes and possible impacts on human settlements. Palaios. 2016 Dec 1;31(12):616-29. [DOI:10.2110/palo.2016.055]
17. Gurjazkaite K, Routh J, Djamali M, Vaezi A, Poher Y, Beni AN, Tavakoli V, Kylin H. Vegetation history and human-environment interactions through the late Holocene in Konar Sandal, SE Iran. Quaternary Science Reviews. 2018 Aug 15;194:143-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.06.026]
18. Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of domesticated plants in Southwest Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin. Oxford University Press on Demand; 2012. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199549061.001.0001]
19. Struwe L. Field identification of the 50 most common plant families in temperate regions.
20. Kamilya P, Das A, Das A, Sarkar A. Comparative analysis of major phenotypical traits of some Dicotyledonous weed seedlings of crop fields of Balurghat Block, Dakshindinajpur, West Bengal.
21. Jacomet S. Identification of cereal remains from archaeological sites. Basel University, Basel. 2006.
22. Mackizadeh Tafti M, Sharifi Ashourabadi E. Atlas of the Seeds of Medicinal plants. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. 2017; 1. [In Persian] [مکی‏زاده تفتی مریم، شریفی عاشورآبادی ابراهیم. اطلس بذور گیاهان دارویی (جلد اول). موسسه تحقیقات، جنگل‏ها و مراتع کشور، 1396.]
23. Baas P, Gasson PE, Wheeler EA, editors. IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification: with an appendix on non-anatomical information. National Herbarium of the Netherlands; 1989.
24. Paulssen LM. Identification of active charcoals and wood charcoals. Identification of active charcoals and wood charcoals.. 1964.
25. Parsa Pajouh D, Schweingruber FH. Atlas des bois du nord de l'Iran. Description anatomique et identification microscopique des essences principales.
26. Neumann, K. S. Détienne, W. P. Schweingruber, F.H. Wood of the Sahara and the Sahel. Birmensdorf, Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL. Haupt Verlag, Bern/ Stuttgart/Wien. 2000.
27. Niloufari P. Textebook of wood technology. University of Tehran Publication. 1986: 737. [In Persian] [نیلوفری پرویز. چوب‏شناسی چوب‏های ایران. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 1364.]
28. Hejazi R. Principales of wood anatomy. Dehkhoda Publication; 1979. [In Persian] [حجازی رضا. اصول تشریح چوب (تشریح و کلید شناسایی میکروسکوپی مهمترین چوب‏های جنگلی ایران). انتشارات کتابفروشی دهخدا، 1358.]
29. Akhani H. Biodiversity of halophytic and sabkha ecosystems in Iran. InSabkha ecosystems 2006 (pp. 71-88). Springer, Dordrecht. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4020-5072-5_6]
30. Asadi M. Flora of Iran. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands.1989; 1. [In Persian] [اسدی مصطفی. فلور ایران. انتشارات موسسه تحقیقات، جنگل‏ها و مراتع کشور. شماره 1، 1367.]
31. Perrot J, Madjidzadeh Y. L'iconographie des vases et objets en chlorite de Jiroft (Iran). Paléorient. 2005 Jan 1:123-52. [DOI:10.3406/paleo.2005.5129]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2021 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Research on Archaeometry

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb