Sampling for Historical-Cultural Artifacts in Iran: Challenges and Solutions - Journal of Research on Archaeometry

قابل توجه نویسندگان محترم، مقالاتی که از تاریخ 1404/07/13 برای نشریه ارسال می شوند،  شامل پرداخت هزینه بررسی نخواهند شد.

------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------
year 11, Issue 1 (2025)                   JRA 2025, 11(1): 0-0 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Razani M, Rajabi N. (2025). Sampling for Historical-Cultural Artifacts in Iran: Challenges and Solutions. JRA. 11(1), : 2 doi:10.61882/jra.2025.11.102
URL: http://jra-tabriziau.ir/article-1-455-en.html
1- Faculty of Applied Arts, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran , m.razani@tabriziau.ac.ir
2- Independent Researcher in Field of Archaeology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1503 Views)
Scientific and field-laboratory research in the domain of historical and cultural artifacts confronts a multitude of challenges, including the neglect of laboratory sciences as a priority in policy-making and executive programs; the absence or inadequacy of suitable and efficient laboratory equipment and facilities; the failure to allocate sufficient financial resources for laboratory-based research; and the lack or weakness of regulations to systematize sampling from historical objects and artifacts. Sampling constitutes the foundation of numerous laboratory researches grounded in heritage, which, beyond scientific protocols, necessitates a clear and defined framework of legal regulations—a framework that adheres to domestic legal requirements and considerations, particularly in the issuance of permits for sampling from historical objects and fabrics.The process of sampling and conducting analyses on samples from historical artifacts, especially in archaeometry, is profoundly influenced by political and security constraints. These limitations have rendered access to advanced methodologies and technologies for cultural and historical research exceedingly difficult, while, on the other hand, the exigency to undertake such investigations abroad has exacerbated Iran's dependency on foreign institutions. In circumstances where fluctuations in political relations with advanced nations (predominantly Western) impede effective measures in laboratory activities—such as the importation of equipment, the establishment of comprehensive and sophisticated laboratories, or the dispatch of samples to reference laboratories abroad—at minimum, emphasis can be placed on the formulation of laws and guidelines that facilitate and systematize the domestic sampling process. This approach propels research endeavors with minimal administrative and technical impediments, insulated from individual predilections and subjective perspectives. Such a measure can serve as an invaluable instrument for administrators and scholars in justifying the imperative of laboratory research within the realm of cultural heritage, averting administrative and scholarly disarray, and ultimately furnishing a conducive milieu for autonomous scientific advancements in archaeological sciences and enhanced preservation of Iran's cultural heritage.  
Article number: 2
Full-Text [PDF 1444 kb]   (169 Downloads)    
Technical Note: Original Research | Subject: Archaeometry
Received: 2025/02/22 | Accepted: 2025/04/7 | Published: 2025/06/30 | ePublished: 2025/06/30

References
1. Alizadeh, A., Arfaee, A., Ghafoori, O., Biglari, F., Nokandeh, J., Davoudi, H., & Hassan-Zadeh, Y. (2016). Catalog of selected works from the organization project of the National Museum of Iran's depots. National Museum of Iran and Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute.
2. Artioli, G. (2010). Scientific methods and cultural heritage: An introduction to the application of materials science to archaeometry and conservation science. OUP Oxford. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548262.003.0001]
3. Atyabi, M. [miras_bashi]. (2024, October 21). History is entrusted to the fire and waste dump in the courtyard of the General Administration of Cultural Heritage in Kermanshah [Instagram post]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/miras_bashi/p/DBYpE8UNTkm/?img_index=1
4. Baillie, M. G. (2014). Tree-ring dating and archaeology. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315748689]
5. British Standards Institute. (2012). Conservation of cultural property. Methodology for sampling from materials of cultural property. General rules. BSI Standards. https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/standards-and-ethics/conservation-standards.html
6. Council of Ministers. (2003). Regulations on cultural, artistic, and historical properties of public and governmental institutions (Approval No. 50446/T25224H). Retrieved from https://qavanin.ir/Law/PrintText/?IDS=10392617388859766941&font=
7. Etyabi, M. [miras_bashi]. (2024, October 21). History is entrusted to the fire and waste dump in the courtyard of the General Administration of Cultural Heritage in Kermanshah [Instagram post]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/miras_bashi/p/DBYpE8UNTkm/?img_index=1
8. General Administration of Museums. (2014). Instructions for delivering archaeological findings to relevant administrative units in the Cultural Heritage Organization (Circular No. 38439/933500). Retrieved from https://iranmuseums.mcth.ir/regulations?EntryId=27&Command=Core_Download&Method=attachment
9. Ghannami, O. (2009). Collection of laws and regulations of cultural heritage and tourism. Qalamroo Farhang.
10. ISNA. (2023, June 22). More details on the major smuggling of historical artifacts [in Persian]. https://www.isna.ir/news/1402040100008
11. Knaf, A., Londero, P., Nikkel, J., Hark, R., & Bezur, A. (2021). Novel portable laser ablation micro-sampling in cultural Heritage. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 27(S1), 3014-3016. [DOI:10.1017/S1431927621010473]
12. Oddy W.A. (1984). In Thomson J.M.A, Bassett D.A., Duggan A.J., Lewis G.D. & Fenton A. (Eds.), Manual of curatorship. A guide to museum practice (pp. 480-486). Butterworth-Heinemann.
13. Razani, M., & Nasirzadeh, B. (2014). Forgery and fraud in antiquities and visual arts: Concepts, typology, legal fate, and examination methods [in Persian]. In M. Razani & B. Ajorloo (Eds.), Selected papers from the first and second national conference on the application of scientific analyses in archaeometry and restoration of cultural heritage (pp. 107-132). Tabriz Islamic Art University. http://jra-tabriziau.ir/files/site1/files/1-2-Archaeometry_samp/binder6.pdf
14. Razani, M., Sehati, F., & Kasiri, M. B. (2021). Archaeometry in the Cultural Heritage Studies and Art (Definitions, Future Trends and Challenges) [in Persian]. Journal of Research in Archaeology, 7(1), 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jra.7.1.1 [DOI:10.52547/jra.7.1.1]
15. Razani, M., & Shojai Maleki, Z. (2023). A Typological Investigation of Forged Historical and Cultural Ceramics in Iran [in Persian]. Knowledge of Cultural Heritage, 6(1), 38-49. http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-79-fa.html [DOI:10.61882/kcr.6.1.38]
16. Razani, M., & Taghavi, N. (2024). Absolute Dating of Ancient Limes Base Mortars Using 14C Carbon Method [in Persian]. Journal of Research in Archaeology, 10(1), 189-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.61186/jra.10.1.367
17. Rixhon, G., Briant, R. M., Cordier, S., Duval, M., Jones, A., & Scholz, D. (2017). Revealing the pace of river landscape evolution during the Quaternary: Recent developments in numerical dating methods. Quaternary Science Reviews, 166, 91-113. [DOI:10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.08.016]
18. Shackley, M. S. (1998). Gamma rays, X-rays and stone tools: Some recent advances in archaeological geochemistry. Journal of Archaeological Science, 25, 259-270. [DOI:10.1006/jasc.1997.0247]
19. Stern, W. B. (2001). Archaeometry-Analyzing the Cultural Heritage. Chimia, 55(11), 915-915. [DOI:10.2533/chimia.2001.915]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research on Archaeometry

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb