The Oldest Use of Tile in Architectural Decorations of the Islamic Period of Iran and Recognition of Combined Fractured Pieces of Glazed Pottery and Plaster-Brick Decorations Technique in Khajeh Atabak Kerman - Journal of Research on Archaeometry
year 5, Issue 1 (2019)                   JRA 2019, 5(1): 55-80 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hamzavi Y. The Oldest Use of Tile in Architectural Decorations of the Islamic Period of Iran and Recognition of Combined Fractured Pieces of Glazed Pottery and Plaster-Brick Decorations Technique in Khajeh Atabak Kerman. JRA. 2019; 5 (1) :55-80
URL: http://jra-tabriziau.ir/article-1-177-en.html
Tabriz Islamic Art University , y.hamzavi@tabriziau.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1480 Views)
The companion of different materials in architectural decorations of Iran, during the Islamic era, in many cases has opened up new art styles and techniques and changed the aesthetic look of the cultures that carry this phenomenon. The accompaniment of brick, plaster and glaze decorations is one of the fascinating changes in the history of art of Iranian architectural decorations that its history of invention has remained somewhat obscure. Meanwhile, the initial idea of using tiles in the decorations of Iranian architecture in the Islamic era remains largely unknown. Tile is a type of architectural decoration that may be originated from ancient Iran, and therefore, little information is available about the manufacturing and execution techniques and specimens of tile works from the early centuries of the Islamic era. This aim of this work was to distinguish between the tile and the glazed-brick. From the view-point of the researcher, when the thickness of the glazed-ceramic exceeds from its width, the work becomes glazed-brick, while the width of the glazed-ceramic become greater than its thickness, it will be a tile. The main purpose of this research was to obtain the information on the oldest tiles of the Islamic period in Iran, which could be found as the glazed-ceramic in the architectural design Khajeh Atabak in Kerman. In order to achieve the aims of this research, the study of written sources and the field studies were carried out simultaneously, to characterize the tile works in Iranian architectural decorations, especially at the tomb of Khajeh Atabak in Kerman. On the basis of the results obtained, it could be said that unfortunately from the Islamic period in Iran till the 11th century AD., no dated tiles have been left. Many of the tiles with no written date on them have been dated by researchers regardless the manufacturing technology, and only based on the tiles appearance and archaeological characteristics.  These dating studies have not been performed based on the laboratory studies and they were actually done with speculation, so are not scientifically acceptable. For example, for decades it was thought that the oldest tiles in Iranian architecture belong to the Qazvin Jame-Mosque, while as a result of field studies realized in this research, it was found that there is no antique tile in this monument, where the color of the painting was mistakenly recognized as tile. Donald Wilber reported this error for the first time, and over the several decades, all the researchers repeated the same error without careful scrutiny. Anyway, the tile samples of five monuments with a collection of tiles or with one single tile were identified as the oldest tiles of the Islamic period in Iran. One of the main results of this research is to identify the use of fractured pieces of glazed pottery in architectural decorations, where some researchers have identified these works as the tiles. In these cases, both sides of the pieces of potteries have glaze and the body is very thin and delicate along with the arches and curves. Moreover, in some cases the edges of the pottery container can also be seen. Achieving this result reinforces this hypothesis that using the broken pottery container may have formed the first idea for tiles construction.
Full-Text [PDF 2723 kb]   (384 Downloads)    
Technical Note: Original Research | Subject: Archaeometry
Received: 2019/05/5 | Accepted: 2019/06/29 | Published: 2019/07/1 | ePublished: 2019/07/1

References
1. Kashani AA. Arayes Aljavaher va Nafayes Alatayeb 1301. Tehran: Almaa; 2007.
2. Wilber DN. The development of mosaic faience in Islamic architecture in Iran. Ars Islam 1939:16-47.
3. Allan JW, (Oxford) AM. Medieval Middle Eastern Pottery. Ashmolean Museum Oxford; 1971.
4. Ghandi S. The role of the tile in Iranian architecture. Vis Arts Stud 2003; 20:183-6. [In Persian] [قندی سیاوش. نقش کاشی در معماری ایرانی. مطالعات هنرهای تجسمی 1382؛20: 183-186.[
5. Karl j D. Islamic Art In Architecture, Tile, Metalworking, Knitting, Painting. (Translated by Basiri R.).Tehran: Farhangsara; 1984. [In Persian] [کارل جی دوری. هنر اسلامی در معماری، کاشی‏کاری، فلزکاری، بافندگی، نقاشی. (ترجمۀ بصیری رضا). تهران: فرهنگسرا؛ 1363.]
6. Maheronaghsh M. Tile and its application. Tehran: Samt; 2002. [In Persian] [ماهرالنقش محمود. کاشی و کاربرد آن. تهران: سمت؛ 1381.]
7. Bloom JM. Minaret: symbol of Islam. Oxford University Press Oxford; 1989. [In Persian]
8. Mehrpooya J. Traditional architecture arrays in mosques of Iran. Art J 1997; 33: 556-73. [In Persian] [مهرپویا جمشید. آرایه‏های معماری سنتی در مساجد ایران. مجلۀ هنر 1376؛ 33: 556-573.[
9. Kiani M, Karimi F, Qouchani A. Introduction to the art of tiling in Iran. Tehran: Museum of the Reza Abbasi; 1983. [In Persian] [کیانی محمدیوسف، کریمی فاطمه، قوچانی عبدالله. مقدمه‏ای بر هنر کاشیگری ایران. تهران: اداره کل موزه‏ها، موزۀ رضا عباسی؛ 1362.]
10. Adl S. The tile of the Jame Damghan Mosque (about 1058 AC) is the oldest surviving example of the use of the tile in the Islamic architecture of Iran. Asar 1982; 3(7,7,9): 297-302. [In Persian] [عدل شهریار. کتیبۀ کاشی منار مسجد جامع دامغان (حدود 450 ه.ق.) کهن‏ترین نمونه بازمانده در جای از کاربرد کاشی در معماری اسلامی ایران. اثر 1361؛ 3( 7، 8، 9): 297-302.]
11. Hill D, Grabar O. Islamic Architecture and Its Decoration AD 800-1500: A Photographic Survey. Faber; 1967.
12. Carboni S, Masuya T. Persian tiles. Metropolitan Museum of Art; 1993.
13. Pope AU, Ackerman P, Besterman T. A survey of Persian art from prehistoric times to the present: Arthur Upham Pope, editor; Phillis Ackerman, assistant editor. vol. 6. Oxford University Press; 1964.
14. Godard A, Godard Y, Siroux M. Athar-e Iran. (Translated by Sarv-Moghadam A.). Mashhad: Islamic Research Foundation Astan Quds Razavi; 1992. [In Persian] [گدار آندره، گدار یدا؛ سیرو ماکسیم. آثار ایران. (ترجمه: سروقد مقدم ابوالحسن). مشهد: بنیاد پژوهش‏های اسلامی آستان قدس رضوی؛ 1371.]
15. Motaghedi K. Khandan e Taher e Kashani. Tehran: Peykare; 2014. [In Persian] [معتقدی کیانوش. خاندان طاهر کاشانی. تهران: پیکره؛ 1393.]
16. Qouchani A. Persian Poems in Takhte Soleyman Tiles. Tehran: Academic Publishing Center; 1992. [In Persian] [قوچانی عبدالله. اشعار فارسی کاشی‏های تخت سلیمان. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی؛ 1371.[
17. Godard A, Godard Y, Siroux M. Athar-e-Iran. Transl. by Abolhasan Sarvghad Moghadam. Astan-e-quds-Razavi, Mashhad: Astan-e-quds-Razavi; 1992.
18. Oghabi M. Encyclopedia of Islamic monuments - monuments of the tomb. Tehran: Islamic Art and Culture Research Center; 1999. [In Persian] [عقابی محمد مهدی. دایره‏المعارف بناهای تاریخی دوره اسلامی-بناهای آرامگاهی. تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و هنر اسلامی- حوزه هنری؛ 1378.]
19. Hamzavi Y, Aslani H. Architectural Decorations of Pir-Bakran Mausoleum. Isfahan: Goldasteh; 2012. [In Persian] [حمزوی یاسر، اصلانی حسام. آریه‏های معماری بقعۀ پیربکران. اصفهان: گلدسته؛ 1391. [
20. Mason RB, Tite MS, Paynter S, Salter C. Advances in Polychrome Ceramics in the Islamic World of the 12th Century AD. Archaeometry 2001;43:191-209. doi:10.1111/1475-4754.00014. [DOI:10.1111/1475-4754.00014]
21. Mason R, Tite M. The Beginnings of Islamic Stonepaste Technology*. Archaeometry 1994;36:77-91. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1994.tb01066.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1994.tb01066.x]
22. Bernsted A-MK. Early Islamic pottery: materials and techniques. 2003.
23. Tite MS, Wolf S, Mason RB. The technological development of stonepaste ceramics from the Islamic Middle East. J Archaeol Sci 2011;38:570-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.011]
24. Tite MS. The Technology of Glazed Islamic Ceramics using Data Collected By the Late Alexander Kaczmarczyk. Archaeometry 2011;53:329-39. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2010.00546.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2010.00546.x]
25. Young S. An analysis of Chinese blue-and-white. Orient Art 1956;2:43-7.
26. Banks M, Merrick J. Further Analysis of Chinese Blue-And-White. Archaeometry 1967;10:101. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1967.tb00620.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1967.tb00620.x]
27. Glascock MD, Popelka-Filcoff RS, Speakman RJ. Archaeological chemistry: analytical techniques and archaeological interpretation. American Chemical Society; 2007. [DOI:10.1021/bk-2007-0968]
28. Mason RB. Shine like the sun: Lustre-Painted and Associated Pottery from the Medieval Middle east. vol. 12. Mazda Pub; 2004.
29. Koss K, McCarthy B, Chase ES, Smith D. Analysis of Persian painted minai ware. Sci. Res. Hist. Asian Ceram. Proc. Fourth Forbes Symp. Free. Gall. Art, Archetype London; 2009, p. 33-47.
30. Schorsch D, Manuels M. The Sherman Fairchild center for Objects Conservation, the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Treat Res Notes 2001;3.
31. Wen R, Pollard AM. The Pigments Applied to Islamic Minai Wares and the Correlation with Chinese Blue-and-White Porcelain. Archaeometry 2016;58:1-16. doi:10.1111/arcm.12143. [DOI:10.1111/arcm.12143]
32. Tite M. Iznik Pottery: An Investigation of the Methods of Production. Archaeometry 1989;31:115-32. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1989.tb01008.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1989.tb01008.x]
33. Paynter S, Okyar F, Wolf S, Tite MS. The production technology of Iznik pottery-a reassessment*. Archaeometry 2004;46:421-37. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00166.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00166.x]
34. Kingery WD, Vandiver PB. Ceramic masterpieces: art, structure, technology. 1986.
35. Pérez‐Arantegui J, Molera J, Larrea A, Pradell T, Vendrell‐Saz M, Borgia I, et al. Luster pottery from the thirteenth century to the sixteenth century: a nanostructured thin metallic film. J Am Ceram Soc 2001;84:442-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00674.x]
36. Kreibig U, Vollmer M. Optical properties of metal clusters. vol. 25. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
37. Pradell T, Molera J, Smith AD, Climent-Font A, Tite MS. Technology of Islamic lustre. J Cult Herit 2008;9:e123-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2008.06.010]
38. Smith AD, Pradell T, Molera J, Vendrell M, Marcus MA, Pantos E. MicroEXAFS study into the oxidation states of copper coloured Hispano-Moresque lustre decorations. J. Phys. IV, vol. 104, EDP sciences; 2003, p. 519-22. [DOI:10.1051/jp4:20030136]
39. Molera J, Mesquida M, Pérez-Arantegui J, Pradell T, Vendrell M. Lustre Recipes from A Medieval Workshop in Paterna. Archaeometry 2001;43:455-60. doi:10.1111/1475-4754.00028. [DOI:10.1111/1475-4754.00028]
40. Padovani S, Borgia I, Brunetti B, Sgamellotti A, Giulivi A, d'Acapito F, et al. Silver and copper nanoclusters in the lustre decoration of Italian Renaissance pottery: an EXAFS study. Appl Phys A 2004;79:229-33. [DOI:10.1007/s00339-004-2516-2]
41. Pradell T, Molera J, Smith AD, Tite MS. Early Islamic lustre from Egypt, Syria and Iran (10th to 13th century AD). J Archaeol Sci 2008;35:2649-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.011]
42. Ahmadi H, Salehi kakhki A, Abed Esfahani A. Relationship Between Color and Metallic Shine With the Size of Metal Nanoparticles in Luster Decorations. J Color Sci Technol 2017;1: 67-77. [In Persian] [احمدی حسین، صالحی کاخکی احمد، عابد اصفهانی عباس، رابطه رنگ و درخشش فلزی با اندازه نانوذرات فلزی در تزئینات زرین‏فام. نشریۀ علمی-پژوهشی علوم و فناوری رنگ، 1396؛ 11: 69-77[.
43. Mehrabi Kermani S. Tazkara al-Awlia or Mazarat e Kerman. Kerman: Center for Kermanology; 2004. [In Persian] [محرابی کرمانی سعید. تذکره الاولیا یا مزارات کرمان. به اهتمام حسین کوهی، کرمان: مرکز کرمان‏شناسی؛ 1383.[
44. Meshkati N. List of historical monuments and ancient sites of Iran. Tehran: National Organization of Conservation of ancient objects in Iran; 1970. [In Persian] [مشکوتی نصرت‏الله. فهرست بناهای تاریخی و اماکن باستانی ایران. تهران: سازمان ملی حفاظت آثار باستانی ایران؛ 1349.[
45. Poursfar S. A review of the decoration of the tomb of Khwaja Atabak. Kerman: Kermanshenasi; 2007. [In Persian] [پورصفر شهرزاد. بررسی تزئینات مقبرۀ خواجه اتابک. کرمان: کرمان‏شناسی؛ 1386.[
46. Hatam G. Islamic architecture of Iran during the Seljuk period. Tehran: Jahad e Daneshgahi; 2000. [In Persian] [حاتم غلامعلی. معماری اسلامی ایران در دورۀ سلجوقیان. تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی؛ 1379.[
47. Rousta J. Examination of the position of Khaje Atabak Aladdin and Atabak Qotb al-Din Muhammad in Kerman, past and present. Iran Stud 2017;31:81-100. [In Persian] [روستا جمشید. واکاوی جایگاه خواجه اتابک علاءالدین و اتابک قطب‏الدین محمد در کرمان گذشته و حال. مطالعات ایرانی 1396؛31: 81-100.[
48. Waziri A. Date of Kerman. Tehran: Elmi; 1991. [In Persian] [وزیری احمد علی. تاریخ کرمان. به کوشش محمد ابراهیم باستانی پاریزی، جلد اول، تهران: انتشارات علمی؛ 1370.[
49. Abu Hamed Kermani A. Ahd al-Ala Lemoquf al-Ala. Tehran: Ruzbehan Publication; 1977. [In Persian] [ابو حامد کرمانی، افضل‏الدین. عقدالعلی لموقوف الاعلی. به اهتمام عامری نایینی، تهران: نشر روزبهان؛ 2536.]
50. Ibn Asir EA. Al kamel: Tarikh e Bozorge Islam va Iran. (Translated by Halat A.). vol. 21. Iranian Books; n.d. [In Persian] [ابن اثیر عزالدین علی. الکامل: تاریخ بزرگ اسلام و ایران. جلد 21، (ترجمۀ حالت ابوالقاسم). شرکت سهای کتب ایران؛ بی‏تا.[
51. Khabisi Hosseini M. Seljuk and Ghoz in Kerman. Tehran: Tahuri Bookstore Publishing; 1964. [In Persian] [خبیصی حسینی محمدابراهیم. سلجوقیان و غز در کرمان. به کوشش باستانی پاریزی، انتشارات کتابفروشی طهوری؛ 1343.[
52. Mousavi Haji R, Baho M, Shahsavari M. A structure in its political and social context: the tomb of Khwaja Atabak: constructor and construction date. Iran Stud 2008;13: 229-46. [In Persian] [موسوی حاجی سیدرسول، باهو محمدرضا، شهسواری میثم. یک سازه در بستر سیاسی و اجتماعی خود: آرامگاه خواجه اتابک: سازنده و تاریخ ساخت. مطالعات ایرانی 1387؛ 13: 229-246.[
53. Javadi Sh. The appearance of color in the outer decorations of the building: A review of the tomb of Khwaja Atabak from the oldest examples of the Negin tile in Iran. Modarres e Honar 2003;1. [In Persian] [جوادی شهره. ظهور رنگ در تزیینات خارجی بنا: بررسی مقبرۀ خواجه اتابک از قدیمی‏ترین نمونه‏های کاشی نگین در ایران. مدرس هنر 1382؛ 1[
54. Archive of Improvement and Modernization Organization of Kerman. 2006. [In Persian] [آرشیو سازمان بهسازی و نو سازی شهر کرمان. مقبره خواجه اتابک کرمان. 1385.[
55. Agha-Aligol D, Jafarzadeh M, Moradi M. Micro-PIXE: A Powerful Technique in Measurement and Determination of Raw Materials of Glass Artifacts of Parthian Period From Shaur(Susa). J Res Archaeom 2018;4(1):47-65. [In Persian] [آقا علی گل داود، جعفری‏زاده مسلم، مرادی محمود. میکروپیکسی: روشی توانمند در بررسی و تعیین مواد اولیه مصنوعات شیشه‏ای دورۀ اشکانی کاخ شائور (شوش). پژوهۀ باستان‏سنجی1397؛ 4 (1): 47-65. [ [DOI:10.29252/jra.4.1.47]
56. Rezayi Farimani Z, Mousavi Kuhpar M. An Investigation of Glassmaking Industry at Tal-I Malyan Based on PIXE analysis. J Res Archaeom 2017;3(1):47-63. [In Persian] [رضایی فریمانی زهرا، موسوی کوهپر سید مهدی. بررسی صنعت شیشه‏گری در تل ملیان استان فارس براساس آنالیز PIXE. پژوهۀ باستان‏سنجی 1396؛ 3 (1): 47-63. [ [DOI:10.29252/jra.3.1.47]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Research on Archaeometry

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb