Spatial Configuration and Social Organization in Shahr-i-Sokhta Architecture Based on the Space Syntax Approach (Case Study: Building 1 from II and III Periods and Building 20 from IV Period) - Journal of Research on Archaeometry
------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------
year 8, Issue 1 (2022)                   JRA 2022, 8(1): 115-134 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghorbani H R, Nemati Giv S, Moradi H. Spatial Configuration and Social Organization in Shahr-i-Sokhta Architecture Based on the Space Syntax Approach (Case Study: Building 1 from II and III Periods and Building 20 from IV Period). JRA 2022; 8 (1) :115-134
URL: http://jra-tabriziau.ir/article-1-305-en.html
1- Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran , hr.ghorbani@aui.ac.ir
2- Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
3- Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (2278 Views)
Space Syntax is a structuralist research approach to architecture that makes it possible to understand and interpret the social organization in built environments by studying the phenotype (structure) and understanding the genotype (function). The architectural remains from the past are important indicators in archaeological sites and the most significant findings in applying the space syntax approach. There is little information on the extent to which prehistoric buildings are capable of providing spatial configuration and social organization or the extent to which the space syntax approach can identify, perceive and interpret them in prehistoric and early historic structures and sites. Previous studies, with a few exceptions, have considered the use of the space syntax approach not in prehistoric houses or population areas but the later and contemporary eras. The present paper aims to use the space syntax method, along with observation tools, field studies, documentary investigations, and A-GRAPH and Depth Map software to perform an analytical comparison of spatial configuration and social organization in buildings1 (II and III periods) and 20 (IV period) of Shahr-i-Sokhta. The study examines the indicators of Depth, Relative Asymmetry, Integration, Control Value, and Space Type in terms of communication, access, privacy, and publicity to answer the following two questions: 1. what are the differences in the pattern of spatial configuration in buildings 1 and 20 of Shahr-i-Sokhta? 2. What is the relationship between their spatial configuration and social organization? The analytical-comparative study of buildings 1 and 20 of Shahr-i-Sokhta clearly shows that building 1 has more depth and consequently a higher degree of privacy, which can belong to the aristocrats or a person with high social status. However, building 20 has more movement, integration, and connectivity; thus, it cannot be considered only a completely private building, and it may have been a more public building.
Full-Text [PDF 2490 kb]   (1039 Downloads)    
Technical Note: Original Research | Subject: Archaeometry
Received: 2022/02/10 | Accepted: 2022/06/20 | Published: 2022/08/21 | ePublished: 2022/08/21

References
1. Flannery K V. The origin of the Village as a settlement type in Mesoamerica and the Near East: a comparative study. In Ucko. P. Tringham. R. and Dimbleby. G. (eds), Man, Settlement and Urbanization: London: Duckworth. 1972.
2. Redman Ch L. Regularity and Change in the Architecture of an Early Village. In The Hilly Flanks. Essays on the Prehistory of Southwestern Asia. Presented to R. J. Braidwood. Edited by T. C. Young JR., P. E. L. Smith P. Mortensen. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. 1983; P. 189-206.
3. Aurenche O. La Maison Orientale: L'Architecture Du Proche-Orient Ancien Des Origines Au Milieu Du 4e Millenaire. Paris: Geuthner; 1981.
4. Hendon J A. Archaeological Approaches to the Organization of Domestic Labor: Household Practice and Domestic Relations. 1996; 25: P. 45-61. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.45]
5. Hamedani Golshan H. Space Syntax, a Brief Review on its Origins and Methods in Architecture and Urban Design Case Study: Brojerdiha Mansion, Kashan, IRAN. Honar - ha - ye- Ziba-Memari-Va-Shahrsazi. 2015; 20(2): P. 85-92. 10.22059/jfaup.2015.56720. [in Persian] [همدانی گلشن حامد. بازاندیشی نظریۀ نحوفضا، رهیافتی در معماری و طراحی شهری؛ مطالعۀ موردی خانۀ بروجردی‌ها. هنرهای زیبا-معماری و شهرسازی، 1394؛ ص. 85-92. 10.22059/jfaup.2015.56720]
6. Hillier WRG, Hanson J, Peponis J. Syntactic Analysis of Settlements. - Architecture et Comportement / Architecture and Behaviour. 1976; 3(3): P. 217-231
7. Hillier B, Hanson J. The social logic of space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1984. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511597237]
8. Steadman Ph. Architecture Morphology: An Introduction to the Geometry of Building Plan. London: Pion; 1983.
9. Memarian Gh H. Space Syntax. Soffeh. 2003; 35(4): P. 75-83. 20.1001.1.1683870.1381.12.4.1.2. [in Persian] معماریان غلامحسین. نحوفضا در معماری. صفه، 1381؛ ص. 75-83
10. Memarian, Gh. Review of Theoretical Foundations of Architecture. 9th Ed. Tehran: Soroush Danesh press. 2016
11. Fladd S. Social Syntax: An Approach to Spatial Modification through the reworking of space syntax for archaeological applications. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2017; 47: P. 127-138. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaa.2017.05.002]
12. Jiang B. Claranunt Ch. Integration of Space Syntax into GIS: New Perspectives for Urban Morphology. Transactions in GIS. 2002; 6(3): P. 295-309. [DOI:10.1111/1467-9671.00112]
13. Byrd B. Banning E. Alternative Approaches for Exploring Levantine Neolithic Architecture, Paléorient. 1989; 15(1): P. 154-160 [DOI:10.3406/paleo.1989.4494]
14. Bradly B. Planning, Growth, and Functional differentiation at a Prehistoric Pueblo: A Case study from SW Colorado. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1993; 20: P. 23-42. [DOI:10.1179/009346993791974343]
15. Brusasco P. Theory and practice in the study of Mesopotamian domestic space. 2004; 78(299): P. 142-157. [DOI:10.1017/S0003598X00092991]
16. Gann, D W. Spatial integration: a space syntax analysis of the villages of the Homol'ovi Cluster Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Arizona, Tucson; 2003.
17. Shapiro J S. A Space Syntax Analysis of Arroyo Hondo Pueblo. School of American Research Press, New York, New Mexico; 2005.
18. Letesson Q. 'Open Day Gallery' or 'Private Collections'? : An insight on Neopalatial wall paintings in their spatial context. In: Panagiotopoulos, D., Günkel-Mascheck, U. (Eds.), Minoan Realities: Approaches to Image, Architecture, and Society in the Aegean Bronze Age (Aegis 5). Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Louvain-al-Neuve. 2012. P. 27-61.
19. Paliou E, Lieberwirth U, Polla S. Spatial Analysis and Social Spaces: Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Interpretation of Prehistoric and Historic Built Environments. De Gruyter, Boston. 2014. [DOI:10.1515/9783110266436]
20. Benech Ch. New approach to the study of city planning and domestic dwellings in the ancient Near East. Archaeological Prospection. 2007; 14(2): P. 87-103. [DOI:10.1002/arp.306]
21. Karimian H, Ahmadi AA. Spatial Archaeology; A Scientific Approach to the Study and Analysis of Architectural Works, Urban Spaces, and Ancient Contexts. Archaological Studies. 2016; 7(2): P. 103-116. 10.22059/JARCS.2015.57750. [in Persian][کریمیان حسن، احمدی عباس علی. باستان‌شناسی فضایی؛ رویکردی علمی در مطالعه و تحلیل آثار معماری، فضاهای شهری و بافت‌های کهن. مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 1394؛ ص. 103-116.[
22. AbbasZadegan M. Space Syntax Theory in the process of urban design with a look at Yazd city. Urban Management. 2002; 9: 64- 75. [in Persian][عباس‌زادگان مصطفی. روش چیدمان فضا در فرایند طراحی شهری با نگاهی به شهر یزد. مدیریت شهری. 1381؛ ص. 64-75.[
23. Yazdan Far A, Moosavi M, Zargardaghigh H. Analysis of the spatial structure of the city of Tabriz in the load range and using the Space Syntax technique, Road and Building. 2011; 67: P. 58-69. [in Persian][یزدانفر عباس، موسوی مهناز، زرگردقیق هانیه. تحلیل ساختار فضایی شهر تبریز در محدودۀ بارو با استفاده از تکنیک اسیس سینتکس. ماهنامه بین‌المللی راه و ساختمان، 1387؛ ص. 58-69.[
24. Rismanchian O, Bell S. The application of space Syntax in studying the structure of the cities. Honar - ha - ye - Ziba-Memari-Va-Shahrsazi. 2010; 2(43): P.49-56. 20.1001.1.22286020.1389.2.43.5.6. [in Persian] [ریسمانجیان امید، بل سایمون.شناخت کاربردی روش چیدمان فضا در درک پیکره‌بندی فضایی شهرها. هنرهای زیبا-معماری و شهرسازی،، 1398؛ ص. 49-56.
25. Bahrainy H, Taghabon S. Testing the application of Space Syntax method in the design of traditional urban spaces. Honar - ha - ye - Ziba-Memari-Va-Shahrsazi. 2012; 3(4): P. 5-18. [in Persian] [بحرینی سیدحسین، تقابن سوده. آزمون کاربرد روش چیدمان فضا در طراحی فضاهای سنتی شهری. هنرهای زیبا- معماری و شهرسازی، 1390؛ ص. 5-18]
26. Kamlipour H, Memarian G H, Faizi M, Mousavian S M F. Formal Classification & Spatial Configuration in Vernacular Housing: A Comparative Study on the Zoning of the Reception Area in Traditional Houses of Kerman Province. 2012; 31(138): P. 3-16. http://jhre.ir/article-1-404-fa.html. [in Persian] [کمالی‌پور حسام، معماریان غلامحسین، فیضی محسن و محمدفرید موسویان. ترکیب شکلی و پیکره‌بندی فضایی در مسکن بومی: مقایسۀ تطبیقی عرصه‌بندی فضای مهمان در خانه‌های سنتی کرمان. مسکن و محیط روستا، 1391؛ ص4.-16.[ http://jhre.ir/article-1-404-fa.html
27. Madahi S M, Memarian G H. A. Space Syntax Analysis of Vernacular Dwelling Configuration (Case Study: Boshrooyeh City). Housing and Rural Environment. 2017. 35(156): P. 49-66. http://jhre.ir/article-1-846-fa.html. [in Persian] [مداحی سیدمهدی، معماریان غلامحسین. تجزیه و تحلیل خانه‌های بومی با رویکرد نحوفضا نمونۀ موردی شهر بشرویه، کاشان. مسکن و محیط روستا، 1395؛ ص. 49-66.[ http://jhre.ir/article-1-846-fa.html
28. Hamedani Golshan H, Motallebi Gh, Behzadfar, M. The Relationship between Spatial Configuration and Social Interaction in Tehran Residential Environments: Bridging the Gap between Space Syntax and Behaviour Settings Theories. Soffeh. . 2021; 30(1): P. 59-76. 10.29252/soffeh.30.1.59. [in Persian] [همدانی گلشن حامد، بهزادفر مصطفی، مطلبی قاسم. تبیین رابطۀ پیکره‌بندی فضایی و تعاملات اجتماعی، با استفاده از برهم‌کنش نحو فضا و روان‌شناسی بوم-شناختی. صفه، 1399؛ ص. 59-76.[ 10.29252/soffeh.30.1.59 [DOI:10.29252/soffeh.30.1.59]
29. Tabatabae Malazi F, Sabernejad J. The Space Syntax Analytical Approach in Understanding the Configuration of Qeshm Vernacular Housing (Case Sudy: Laft Village). Housing and Rural Environment. 2016. 35(154): P. 75-88. http://jhre.ir/article-1-957-fa.html. [in Persian] [طباطبایی فاطمه، صابرنژاد ژاله. رویکرد تحلیلی نحو(چیدمان) فضا در ادراک پیکره‌بندی فضایی مسکن بومی قشم( نمونه موردی روستای لافت)، مسکن و محیط روستا، 1395؛ ص. 77-85.[ http://jhre.ir/article-1-957-fa.html
30. Heidari A. A, Ghasemian Asll, Kiai, M. Analysis of the Spatial Structure of Traditional Iranian Homes Using the space Syntax Method Case Study (Comparison of Yazd, Kashan and Isfahan Houses), Iranian Islamic City Studies. 2017; 28: P.21-33. [in Persian] [حیدری علی‌اکبر، قاسمیان اصل عیسی، کیایی مریم. تحلیل ساختار فضایی خانه‌های سنتی ایران با استفاده از روش نحوفضا مطالعۀ موردی (مقایسۀ خانه‌های یزد، کاشان و اصفهان). مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، 1396؛ ص. 21-33[
31. Peyvastegar Y. Heidari A. A, Kiai M. Investigation of Space Difference and Value of Spaces in Iranian Traditional Houses by Using Space Layout Method. Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies. 2017. 5(20): P. 5-18. http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-426-fa.html. [in Persian] [پیوسته‌گر یعقوب، حیدری علی‌اکبر، کیایی مریم. بررسی عامل تفاوت فضا و ارزش فضایی در خانه‌های سنتی ایران با استفاده از روش چیدمان فضا. مطالعات محیطی هفت حصار. 1396؛ ص. 5-14.[ http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-426-fa.html
32. Behpur Z, Shoaei H.R, Nabimeybodi M. Space Syntax the way to Perceive Arrangement the Spaces of the House in Yazd city, (Periods Qajar, Pahlavi and Islamic Republic). Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate. 2019; 6(8): P. 47-75. [in Persian] [بهپور زهرا، شعاعی حمیدرضا، نبی میبدی مسعود. نحوفضا رهیافتی برای عرصه‌بندی خانه در شهر یزد (دوره‌های قاجاریه، پهلوی و جمهوری اسلامی). معماری اقلیم گرم و خشک،1397؛ ص 47-77]
33. Seyed Sajjadi S M, Moradi H. Excavation at Building nos.1 and 20 at Shahr e Sokhta. In International Journal of Society of Iranian Archaeologists. 2014; 1(1): P. 77-90.
34. Seyed Sajjadi S M, Moradi H. Shahr-i Sokhta 2014-2015 Excavations,The new Results in Areas 1, 20, 26 and 28, Studi di Aerotopografia Archeologica Archeologia Aerea9/15 (Claudio Grenzi ed). 2017; P. 149-167
35. Seyyed Sajjadi S M, Shahr-I Sokhta and Impact on and from Its Neighboring Lands. Journal of the Society for Iranian Archaeology. 2016; 1(1); p: 1-30. [سیدسجادی سیدمنصور. شهرسوخته و سرزمین‌های متأثر و مؤثر در آن. جامعۀ باستان‌شناسی ایران، 1394؛ ص 1-30.
36. Moradi H. Architectural Style and Technique in Prehistoric Sistan: Sustainable Patterns in Shahr-i-Sokhta Architecture from Early 3rd Millennium to the Beginning of the 2nd Millennium BC, Ash-Sharq. 2020; (4); P. 57-88. https://archaeopresspublishing.com/ojs/index.php/ash-sharq/article/view/700
37. Bafna S. Space Syntax A Brief Introduction to Its Logic and Analytic Techniques, Environment and Behavior. 2003; 35(1): P. 17-29. [DOI:10.1177/0013916502238863]
38. Leydesdorff L. The interdisciplinarity of its environment and the citation impact, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2007; 34: P. 826-838. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3307t [DOI:10.48550/arXiv.0911.3095]
39. Sungur C.A, Cagdas G. Effects of Housing Morphology on User Satisfiction, 4th International Space Syntax Symposium London; 2003.
40. Turner A. Being in Space and Space in Being. In: VAN NES, A. (ed.): 5th International Space Syntax Symposium; 2005.
41. Hillier B, Hanson J. What Do We Mean by Building Function? .London: Bartlett School of Architecture and Planning University College press; 1985.
42. Tosi M. Excavations at Shahr-I Sokhta 1969-1970, in Prehistoric Sistan 1: Maurizio Tosi (Ed.). Rome. IsMEO. 1983; P. 73-127.
43. Seyyed Sajjadi S M. Some Preliminary Observations from the new excavations at the graveyard of Shahr-i Sokhta in C.C.Lamberg-Karlovsky and B.Genito (eds.) Maurizio Tosi e L'Archeologia come modo di vivere. AR, London. 2014.
44. Moradi, H., 2012. Urbanism Expansion at Shahr-i Sokhta Period IV. Collection of articles of Shahre- Sokhte 2, by Seyed Mansour Seyed Sajjadi and Enrico Scalone. 117-137. [in Persian] [مرادی حسین. توسعه و گسترش شهری در دورۀ چهارم استقراری شهر سوخته. مجموعه مقالات شهر سوختۀ 2، به کوشش سیدمنصور سیدسجادی و انریکو اسکالونه. تهران: پیشین‌پژوه؛ 1398؛ ص. 117-137[
45. Seyed Sajjadi S.M.S, Moradi H. Exploring Workshops No. 26 and 28 of Shahr-e Sokhteh. Athar. 2017; 74; P. 103-130. [in Persian] [سیدسجادی سیدمنصور، مرادی حسین. کاوش در کارگا‌ه‌های شمارۀ 26 و 28 شهرسوخته. اثر، 1395؛ ص130-103.[
46. Vaughan L. The spatial syntax of urban segregation, Progress in Planning. 2007; 67: P. 205-294. [DOI:10.2307/2694146]
47. Cutting M. The use of spatial analysis to study prehistoric settlement architecture. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 2003; 22(1): P. 1-21. [DOI:10.1111/1468-0092.00001]
48. Memarian Gh. Familiarity with Iranian Residential Architecture, Extravaganza. Tehran: Soroush Danesh; 2008.
49. Thaler U. Narrative and Syntax, new perspectives on the Late Bronze Age palace of Pylos, Greece, 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, June 2005; (2): P. 327-341
50. Weilguni M. Streets, Spaces and Places: three Pompeiian movement axes analysed. Uppsala (Uppsala Universitet). 2011.
51. Westgate R. House and society in Classical and Hellenistic Crete: a case study in regional variation. American journal of archaeology. 2007; P. 423-457. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40027078 [DOI:10.3764/aja.111.3.423]
52. Van Dyke R M. Space syntax analysis at the Chacoan outlier of Guadalupe, American Antiquity. . 1999; 64: P. 461-473. [DOI:10.2307/2694146]
53. Moradi H. Seyyed Sajjadi S M. Excavations in Square O at Shahr-e Sokhteh. In NĀMVARNĀMEH, Papers in Honour of Massoud Azarnoush. Eds: Hamid Fahimi and Karim Alizadeh. Tehran: IranNegar Publication; 2012; P. 109-124. [in Persian] [مرادی حسین، سیدمنصور سیدسجادی. نشانه‌های رشد تخصص در شهر سوخته II, III بر پایۀ دستاوردهای کاوش در مربع. نامورنامه، مقاله‌های پاسداشت یاد مسعود آذرنوش، به کوشش حمید فهیمی و کریم علیزاده. 1391؛ ص. 109-125.]
54. Banning E, Byrd B. The architecture of PPNB Ain Ghazal, Jordan Bulletin of the American schools of the oriental research. 1984; 225: P. 15-20 [DOI:10.2307/1357072]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Research on Archaeometry

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb