The Re-evaluation of Kerman Neolithic Chronology Based on the Excavation of Tepe Gav Koshi Esfandagheh- Jiroft - Journal of Research on Archaeometry
year 4, Issue 2 (2018)                   JRA 2018, 4(2): 61-79 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alidadi Soleimani N, Fazeli Nashli H. The Re-evaluation of Kerman Neolithic Chronology Based on the Excavation of Tepe Gav Koshi Esfandagheh- Jiroft. JRA. 2018; 4 (2) :61-79
URL: http://jra-tabriziau.ir/article-1-159-en.html
1- University of Tehran , nader_134982@yahoo.com
2- University of Tehran
Abstract:   (291 Views)
Recently, three season of archeological investigation on the Esfandagheh plain in Kerman province has been carried and several Neolithic sites back to seven and six millennium BC has been recorded in this region. Among these, Gav Koshi is a small Neolithic site less than one hectares and has been located in the northwest city of Jiroft. Based on the results of three season of excavations, the site has two important ceramic Neolithic phase of early seventh (with more than 500 years of occupation) and late seventh millennium BC with some gaps between on it. In recent chronological study, Khanipour and Niknami (2017) propose the following chronological tables for the Fars regions includes Transitional Rahmat Abad (7500-7000 BC), Formative Mushki (7000-6400 BC), Mushki (6400-6000 BC), Jari (6000-5600 BC) and Shams Abad (5600-5200 BC) and therefore, the first phase of Gav Koshi back to the Formative Gav Koshi (700-6500 BC) with local development. While the site abandoned for a short period of time, it was reoccupied again during the Gav koshi period (ca. 6400-6000 BC, see table 1). The ceramics of the first phase is completely local and handmade with a fine greyish slip covered on the surface. The red geometric broken lines applied on the exterior around the neck of bowls or diamond used the entire of surface???. The houses were made with mudbrick structures (35×12×12 cm), sometimes the thickness of mudbrick is 50 cm, and so three mudbrick contains the thickness of wall, where they have been usually joint to each other.  The houses dimensions were usually between 2.50 m to 4 m, indicates enough space for each family. Usually, the floor was covered by red ochre.  For the roof, they usually used local reed which is still grow in the region. One of the important discovery of Gav Koshi was a room with dimensions of 285×360 cm, with a floor raised look like a platform and the floor carefully painted with red ochre. The whole internal walls were also painted with red ochre. Numerous of animal bones and also lots of human and animal figuries were found inside the room, indicates that the room had been probably used for ritual practices.  The second phase was very close to the surface and it seems by the time the archtectural remains have been destroyed. While the ceramic of the lower layers indicates local development, but chronologically, the ceramics of upper layers reveal regional chrecterestics similar with Kushk-e Hezar, Mushki/Bashi, Qasr e-Ahmad and Harmangan in the Fars region (Khanipour and Niknami, 2017). During the second phase of Gav Koshi, several samples of mortars and pestles found with the obsidian cores and blades, all indicates regionalization of Kerman Neolithic during the last quarter of seven millennium BC.
Full-Text [PDF 1590 kb]   (117 Downloads)    
Technical Note: Original Research | Subject: Archaeometry
Received: 2018/11/3 | Accepted: 2018/12/29 | Published: 2018/12/30 | ePublished: 2018/12/30

References
1. Darabi H. Reassessment the Neolithization Process of the Central Zagros: Past Approaches Direction future prospects. Tehran University, 2013. [in Persian] [دارابی حجت. ارزیابی مجدد فرایند نوسنگی شدن زاگرس مرکزی: رهیافت‌های گذشته و چشم‌اندازآینده، رساله دکتری باستان‌شناسی. دانشگاه تهران، 1390.]
2. Ajorloo B. The ancient climate of Iran’s plateau in the Neolithic Age. Iran Stud 2012;2:1–20. [in Persian] [آجورلو بهرام. اقلیم دیرین فلات ایران در عصر نوسنگی. پژوهش‌های ایران‌شناسی 1391؛2 :1-20.]
3. Alidadi Soleimani N. Report of the Fifth season of excavation at Gav koshi Esfandagheh Jiroft. Kerman: 2015. [in Persian] [علیدادی سلیمانی نادر. پنجمین فصل گزارش‌های باستان‌شناسی کاوش در تپه گاوکشی اسفندقه جیرفت. اداره کل میراث فرهنگی، صنایع دستی و گردشگری استان کرمان: 1395.]
4. Rafifar j. The popularity of obsidian and its earliest “cultural-technological” exchanges in Iran. J Archeol Hist 1991;5. [in Persian] [رفیع‌فر جلال‌الدین. رواج ابسیدین و کهن‌ترین تبادلات «فرهنگی-تکنولوژیکی» آن در ایران. مجله باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ 1370؛ 5.]
5. Caldwell JR. Pottery and cultural history on the Iranian Plateau. J Near East Stud 1968;27:178–83. [DOI:10.1086/371962]
6. Priket M. Settlement during the early periods.Excavation at Tepe Yahya, Iran 1967. 1975.
7. Lamberg-Karlovsky CC, Beale TW, Adovasio J, Heskel D, Mckerrell H, Meadow RH, et al. Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran, 1967-1975. The Early Periods. Am Sch Prehist Res Bull 1986.
8. Mortezayee M. Archaeological Survey and Identificatio in qale Ganj. 2015.
9. Garazhian O, Rahmati M. Period I of Tali-eAtashi: Pre-pottery neolithic culture andarchitecture in the landscape of SE Iran. Pazhohesh-Ha- Ye Bastanshenasi Iran 2012;2:111–48. [in Persian] [گاراژیان عمران، رحمتی مسعود. دوره اول تل آتشی، فرهنگ نوسنگی پیش از سفال و معماری آن در چشم-انداز جنوب شرق ایران. مجله پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران1391؛2: 48-111.[
10. Alidadi Soleimani N. Report of the First season of excavation at Gav koshi Esfandagheh Jiroft. Kerman: 2013. [in Persian] [علیدادی سلیمانی نادر. بررسی و شناسایی باستان‌شناسی دشت اسفندقه-جیرفت. میراث فرهنگی استان کرمان: 1385[.
11. Harris E. Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. Samira; 1946.
12. Alden JR, Abdi K, Azadi A, Biglari F, Heydari S. Kushk-e Hezar: a Mushki/Jari period site in the Kur river basin, Fars, Iran. Iran 2004;42:25–45. [DOI:10.2307/4300661]
13. Bernbeck R, Abdi K, Gregg M, Heydari S. A note on the Neolithic of the Qara Aghaj Valley, Fars province. Archaeol Reports 2005;4:27–36.
14. Khanipour M, Niknami KA. Sequence Chronology Evaluation of the Neolithic Period at Fars on the Basis of Hormangan Site. J Res Archaeom 2017;3:15–29. [in Persian] [خانی‌پور مرتضی، نیکنامی کمال‌الدین. ارزیابی توالی فرهنگی دوره نوسنگی فارس بر اساس گاهنگاری مطلق محوطه هرمنگان. پژوهه باستان‌سنجی 1396؛ 3: 15-29.]
15. Kharanaghi HA, Nashli HF, Nishiaki Y. Tepe Rahmatabad: A Prepottery and Pottery Neolithic Site in Fars Province. Neolit Iran 2013:108.
16. Hole F. Revisiting the Neolithic. Iran World Essays Iran Art Archaeol Present to Ezat O Negahban (Tehran 1999) 1999:13–27.
17. Darabi H. Revisiting Stratigraphy of Ali Kosh, Deh Luran Plain. Pazhoheshhaye Bastanshenasi Iran 2018;8:27–42. [in Persian] [دارابی حجت. بازنگری لایه‌نگاری تپه علی‌کش، دشت دهلران. پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران 1397؛8: 27-42. [
18. Eskandari N. A Reappraisal of the Chronology of the Chalcolithic Period in SE Iran: Absolute and Relative Chronology of Tepe Dehno and Tepe East Dehno, Shahdad. J Res Archaeom 2018;4:23–35. [in Persian] [اسکندری نصیر. ارزیابی گاهنگاری دوره مس‌سنگی جنوب شرق ایران: گاهنگاری مطلق (۱۴C) و نسبی تپه دهنو و تپه دهنو شرقی شهداد با استفاده از روش طیف‌سنج جرمی شتاب‌دهنده (AMS) . پژوهه باستان سنجی. ۱۳۹۷; ۴ (۱) :۲۳-۳۵]
19. Malek Shahmirzadi S. Iran in prehistory, Iranian archeology from the beginning to the dawn of urbanization. Tehran: Cultural Heritage Organization, Iran; 2003. [in Persian] [ملک شهمیرزادی صادق. ایران در پیش از تاریخ، باستان‌شناسی ایران از آغاز تا سپیده دم شهرنشینی. تهران: سازمان میراث فرهنگی کشور، ایران،1382[.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Research on Archaeometry

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb