An Introduction to the Use of Fuzzy Mathematics in Archeology (Case Study: Virtual Reconstruction of Togrul Tower by Using Fuzzy Reliability) - Journal of Research on Archaeometry
year 4, Issue 2 (2018)                   JRA 2018, 4(2): 35-48 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Taheri S M, Iravani Ghadim F, Kabirian M A. An Introduction to the Use of Fuzzy Mathematics in Archeology (Case Study: Virtual Reconstruction of Togrul Tower by Using Fuzzy Reliability). JRA. 2018; 4 (2) :35-48
URL: http://jra-tabriziau.ir/article-1-140-en.html
1- University of Tehran
2- Art University of Isfahan
3- Art University of Isfahan , ma.kabirian@ut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (323 Views)
Nowadays, the use of fuzzy mathematics and fuzzy logic are increasing in various sciences. Archaeology is one of the sciences that is less attended with the methods of fuzzy mathematics and fuzzy logic. Due to the nature of many archaeological data, however, the use of such methods in archaeology can be beneficial. In this research, it has been tried to explain applications of fuzzy logic and fuzzy mathematics in archaeology. This research have six sections. In the beginning, history of using fuzzy logic in archaeology is presented. Then, fuzzy logic is explained, and in section three, necessity of using fuzzy mathematics and fuzzy logic in archaeology are explained at first and then, situations, parts and mechanism of using fuzzy mathematics and fuzzy logic in archaeology are explained. Situations are where the use of fuzzy mathematics and fuzzy logic are useful, including: when the collected data/documentation/information are imprecise, when the relationships between the variables are imprecise and when there is disagreement between archaeologists. Parts of archaeology where fuzzy logic and fuzzy mathematics are applicable include descriptions of data and analysis of data, postdiction, and decision making. The mechanism of using fuzzy mathematics and fuzzy logic in archaeology include fuzzy reliability, designing of fuzzy inference system, and the use of fuzzy statistics. In section four, virtual reconstruction in archaeology is presented. In section five, the fuzzy reliability is explained and its applications in archaeology are described. One of the applications of fuzzy reliability is its use for the virtual reconstruction of destroyed buildings. And finally in section six, to show the process of this method, as a case study, a semi-destructive structure is reconstructed by using fuzzy reliability. The Toghrul Tower, where a small part of tower is collapsed, is selected for such a case study. Of course, this method is applicable to buildings where a lot of them have been destroyed, and to complex buildings. To determine the characteristics, experts commented on technical, geographical, architectural elements of building. Reconstruction is done step by step and in each step, the reliability is calculated. The reliability of the final model is obtained by combining the reliability of the steps. To obtain reliability, two methods have been suggested: use of expert opinion or mathematical/statistical analysis. The Toghrul Tower is reconstructed in comparison with its similar buildings, as well as architectural and technical analysis. Finally, the form of Toghrul Tower was recognized with determined possibilities. This method is beneficial to the archaeologists and conservator for the scientific prediction and postdiction of the structures and objects.
Full-Text [PDF 1288 kb]   (129 Downloads)    
Technical Note: Original Research | Subject: Archaeometry
Received: 2018/09/16 | Accepted: 2018/12/28 | Published: 2018/12/30 | ePublished: 2018/12/30

References
1. Niccolucci F, D Andrea A, Crescioli M. Archaeological applications of fuzzy databases. BAR Int Ser, 2001;931:107–16.
2. Hermon S, Niccolucci F, Alhaique F, Iovino M-R, Leonini V. Archaeological typologies-an archaeological fuzzy reality. BAR Int Ser 2004;1227:30–4.
3. Niccolucci F, Hermon S. A fuzzy logic approach to reliability in archaeological virtual reconstruction. Proc. of the 32nd International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Budapest, Archaeolingua 2004.
4. De Runz C, Desjardin E, Piantoni F, Herbin M. Using fuzzy logic to manage uncertain multi-modal data in an archaeological GIS. International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality-ISSDQ, vol. 7, Citeseer; 2007.
5. Mink PB, Ripy J, Bailey K, Grossardt TH. Predictive archaeological modeling using GIS-based fuzzy set estimation: A Case Study in Woodford County, in 2009 Proceedings of ESRI Users Conference, Kentucky, 2009.
6. Lieskovský T, Ďuračiová R, Karell L. Selected mathematical principles of archaeological predictive models creation and validation in the GIS environment. Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica. Natural Sciences in Archaeology, 2013;4:177–90. [DOI:10.24916/iansa.2013.2.4]
7. Barceló JA, Bogdanovic I. Mathematics and Archaeology. CRC Press; 2015. [DOI:10.1201/b18530]
8. Maghsoudi M, Zamanzadeh S., Ehdaei A, Yousefi Zoshk R, Yamani M. Analysis of the Role of Environmental Factors in Site Selecting of Prehistoric Settlements in Varamin Plain with Usage Fuzzy Logic. J Spat Plan 2015;19:233–63. [in Persian] [مقصودی مهران، زمان‌زاده سید محمد، اهدائی افسانه، یوسفی زشک روح‌اله، یمانی مجتبی. تحلیل نقش عوامل محیطی در مکان‌گزینی سکونتگاه‌های پیش‌از تاریخ دشت ورامین با استفاده از منطق فازی. برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا 1394؛ 19: 233-63.]
9. Taheri S.M., Iravani Ghadim F, Kabirian M. Using of fuzzy mathematics in archeology. The 6th Iranian joint congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems, Kerman 2018:307–14. [in Persian] [طاهری سید محمود، ایروانی قدیم فرشید، کبیریان محمدعلی. استفاده از ریاضیات فازی در باستان‌شناسی. گزارش ششمین کنگره مشترک سیستم‌های فازی و هوشمند ایران دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان 1396؛ 307-14.]
10. Taheri S.M., Iravani Ghadim F, Kabirian M. Fuzzification of archaeological data for using in fuzzy statistics. 8th Seminar of Fuzzy Statistics and Probablity, Mashhad 2018:93–8. [in Persian] [طاهری سید محمود، ایروانی قدیم فرشید، کبیریان محمدعلی. فازی‌سازی داده‌های باستان‌شناسی به منظور استفاده در آمار فازی. گزارش هشتمین سمینار آمار و احتمال فازی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد 1397؛ 93-8.]
11. Emami SMA. Archaeometry, a Discipline for Linking Archaeology to Natural Sciences (Aims and Scopes). J Res Archaeom 2016;1:75–82. [in Persian] [امامی سید محمدامین. باستان‌سنجی؛ پلی میان علوم طبیعی و مهندسی با باستان‌شناسی (اهداف و دورنما). نشریه پژوه‌ی باستان‌سنجی 1394؛ 1: 82-75.] [DOI:10.29252/jra.1.2.75]
12. Taheri S.M. Feature of fuzzy logic. Math Thought Cult 2006;35:73–92. [in Persian] [طاهری سید محمود. سیمای منطق فازی. فرهنگ و اندیشه ریاضی 1384؛ 35: 73–92.]
13. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 1965:338–53. [DOI:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X]
14. Islami E. Fuzzy logic and its applications. Kerman: Shahid bahonar University; 2013. [in Persian] [اسلامی اسفندیار. منطق فازی وکاربردهای آن. کرمان: انتشارات دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان؛ 1391.]
15. Dubois D, Prade HM. Possibility Theory : an Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. Springer US; 1988. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4684-5287-7]
16. Gaines BR, Kohout TL. Possible automata 1975.
17. Dubois D, Prade H. Possibility theory and its applications: Where do we stand? Springer Handb. Comput. Intell., Springer; 2015, p. 31–60.
18. Agarwal P, Nayal HS. Possibility theory versus probability theory in fuzzy measure theory. Int J Eng Res Appl 2015;5:37–43.
19. Niknami K, Mirashe Z, Ramezani M. An introduction to the virtual modeling process of a sassanian temple of worship, Dargaz. Soffeh 2012;21:96–183. [in Persian] [نیکنامی کمال‌الدین، میراشه زهرا، رمضانی مریم. مقدمه‌ای بر فرایند مدل‌سازی مجازی یک اثر ساسانی نیایشگاه بندیان، درگز. صفه 1390؛ 21: 183–96.]
20. Nazari Arshad R, Tavousi M, Bayani S, Neyestani J. An archaeological study on the burial tomb of Ghorban tower in Hamadan. J Archaeol Stud 2014;6:62–149. [in Persian] [نظری‌ارشد رضا، طاووسی محمود، بیانی سوسن، نیستانی جواد. پژوهشی باستان‌شناختی در بنای آرامگاهی برج قربان همدان. مطالعات باستان‌شناسی 1393؛ 6 (1) : 149–62.]
21. Moghim A, Abbas Zadeh M. The Culture and Nature of Tehran State. Tehran: Karimkhan Zand; 2012. [in Persian] [مقیم علی، دهقان مهرجردی علیرضا، عباس‌زاده عبداله، رئیسی فرنوش. سیمای فرهنگ و طبیعت استان البرز. تهران: انتشارات کریم‌خان زند، 1390.]
22. Kateb M. Tehran and its historic buildings. Hist Surv 1969;3:209–42. [in Persian] [کاتب مجید. تهران و ابنیه تاریخی آن. بررسی‌های تاریخی 1347؛ 3: 209–42.]
23. Pesce L. Tower of Toghrul. Metmuseum n.d.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Research on Archaeometry

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb