Analysis of Rock Cracks in Naqsh-e Rostam Historical Area by Remote Sensing - Journal of Research on Archaeometry
Write your message
year 5, Issue 1 (2019)                   JRA 2019, 5(1): 43-54 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghobadi A, Emami M A, Aslani H, Ojaghi B. Analysis of Rock Cracks in Naqsh-e Rostam Historical Area by Remote Sensing. JRA. 2019; 5 (1) :43-54
URL: http://jra-tabriziau.ir/article-1-116-en.html
1- Art University of Isfahan , azadeh.ghobadi@yahoo.com
2- Art University of Isfahan
3- Yekom Consulting Engineers
Abstract:   (313 Views)
Cultural heritage sites are threatened from a variety of natural and anthropogenic factors. Innovative and cost effective tools are needed to protect them via systematic monitoring of landscapes and cultural heritage sites. In this study, the overall risk in the Naqsh-e Rostam area, as a case study, was assessed in a multidisciplinary approach, based on the remote sensing techniques and Geographical Information System (GIS) analysis. Naqsh-e-Rostam is known as an ancient periphery which is located in northwest of Persepolis in Fars (nowadays Shiraz), Iran. The oldest relief at Naqsh-e-Rostam is severely damaged and dates back to 1,200 B.C., while there is a rock relief thought to be Elamite, originally. Four tombs belonging to Achaemenid kings are carved out of the rock face and seven oversized rock reliefs at Naqsh-e-Rostam depict the monarchs of the Sassanid period. In Sasanian epoch, Naqsh-e-Rostam site was very important due to its religious and national role, where Ernst Emil Herzfeld and Heidemarie Koch estimated its ancientness about 4,000 B.C. This historical site, which is one of the most unique ancient monuments in Iran, is suffering from some problems such as erosion and deep cracks, due to mainly the climatic and geological characteristics of the region. Currently, several damages threaten this site, which are also remarkable on the high reliefs and on the ground, vicinity of the reliefs. These monuments are located in orographic mountains which expose overall to interaction with their surrounded environment. Therefore, existing deterioration as well as erosion process is mainly due to the climatic conditions and geo-environmental factors that cause such challenges. The aim of this study was to analyze the unexpected appearance of a deep fracture with unknown reasons in this site during the recent years and to find the basic phenomenon for the appearance and development of these fractures. First, several natural and anthropogenic hazards were mapped using different remote sensing data and methodologies. All data were gathered from satellite images and products. Then, the results from each hazard were imported into a GIS environment in order to examine the overall risk assessment based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology. The results showed that the methodology applied was effective enough in the understanding of the current conservation circumstances of the monuments in relation to their environment, as well as in the prediction of the future development of the present hazards. Transverse and main cracking are dominant damages that will result erosion in whole of these works. The focal pressure sources, which produced once drainage and haulage of water stream along the crack systems in the rock surfaces, was studied with Aerial Photography and Satellite Imagery, and analyzed with respect to GIS system. Finally, the gullies effect was identified in the back of the rocks.
Full-Text [PDF 1374 kb]   (72 Downloads)    
Technical Note: Original Research | Subject: Conservation Science
Received: 2018/05/12 | Accepted: 2019/06/27 | Published: 2019/07/1 | ePublished: 2019/07/1

References
1. Sami A. Report on Archeology. Tehran: 1972.
2. Schmidt EF. Persepolis I. Structures, reliefs, inscriptions 1957.
3. Shahbazi A. The Authoritative Guide to Naqsh-e Rostam. Tehran: Achaemenid Research Foundation; 1978. [in Persian] [شاپور شهبازی علیرضا. شرح مصور نقش رستم. تهران: بنیاد تحقیقات هخامنشی؛ 1357.]
4. The World Heritage of Persepolis. Persepolis: Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization of Iran; 2004. [in Persian] [پایگاه میراث جهانی تخت جمشید، تخت جمشید: سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری؛ 1386.]
5. Geological Survey & Mineral Explorations of Iran (GSI). Tehran: 2011. [in Persian] [سازمان زمین‌شناسی و اکتشافات معدنی کشور. تهران: 1393.]
6. Mostafavi M. Pars Climate, Historical Works and Fars Ancient Places. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 1993. [in Persian] [مصطفوي محمدتقی. اقليم پارس و آثار تاريخي و اماکن باستاني فارس. تهران: انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگي و نشر اشاره؛ 1375.]
7. National Geoscience Database of Iran 2008. [in Persian] [پایگاه ملی داده‌های علوم زمین کشور 1390، بازیابی از http://www.ngdir.ir/]
8. Shirvani M. Pathology and Conservation of Historical Stone. Shiraz: Perspolice; 2005. [in Persian]. [آسیب‌شناسی و حفاظت از سنگ‌های تاریخی. شیراز: تخت جمشید؛ 1387.]
9. Moradi Ghiasabadi R, Farahani N. Persian Rock Relief. Tehran: Iranian research publications; 2010. [in Persian] [مرادی غیاث‌آبادی رضا، فراهانی نرگس. سنگ‌نگاره‌های صخره‌ای ایران. تهران: انتشارات پژوهش‌های ایرانی؛ 1392.]
10. Qarib A. Knowing the rocks with a special look at the rocks of Iran. Tehran: Municipality Cultural and Cultural Organization; 1990. [in Persian] [قریب عبدالکریم. شناخت سنگ‌ها با نگاهی ویژه به سنگ‌های ایران. تهران: انتشارات و آموزش انقلاب اسلامی؛ 1372.]
11. Geographic Organization of the Armed Forces, Tehran, Geographic Organization of the Armed Forces Publications, 2002. [in Persian] [سازمان جغرافيايي نيروهاي مسلح، اطلس راهنماي استان‌های ايران. انتشارات سازمان جغرافيايي نيروهاي مسلح، تهران: 1384.]
12. Spreafico MC, Franci F, Bitelli G, Girelli VA, Landuzzi A, Lucente CC, et al. Remote sensing techniques in a multidisciplinary approach for the preservation of cultural heritage sites from natural hazard: The case of Valmarecchia Rock Slabs (RN, Italy). Eng. Geol. Soc. Territ. 8, Springer; 2015, p. 317-21. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-09408-3_55]
13. Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Al-Kathery M, Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD. Assessment of rockfall hazard at Al-Noor Mountain, Makkah city (Saudi Arabia) using spatio-temporal remote sensing data and field investigation. J African Earth Sci 2015;101:309-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.09.021]
14. Oikonomidis D, Dimogianni S, Kazakis N, Voudouris K. A GIS/remote sensing-based methodology for groundwater potentiality assessment in Tirnavos area, Greece. J Hydrol 2015;525:197-208. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.056]
15. Pickard R, Thyse M. Towards a common goal. Pick R(Ed), Manag Hist Centres, Spon Press Taylor Fr London, UK 2001:274-90.
16. Refahi H. Water Erosion and Conservation. 2298th ed. Tehran: University of Tehran press; 2012. [in Persian] [رفاهی حسینقلی. فرسایش آبی و کنترل آن. تهران: انتشارات موسسه چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه؛ 1394.]
17. Sedaghat M. Land and water resources. Tehran: University of Payamenoor publications; 2010. [in Persian] [صداقت محمود. زمین و منابع آب (آب‌های زیرزمینی). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه پیام نور؛ 1392.]
18. Movahed Danesh A. Iranian Surface Water Hydrology. Tehran: SAMT Publications; 2011. [in Persian] [موحد دانش علی‌اصغر. هیدرولوژی آب‌های سطحی ایران. تهران: انتشارات سمت؛ ۱۳۹۳.]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Research on Archaeometry

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb