The Technology of Metal Objects in the North and Northwest of Iran during the Iron Age based on Metallographic Experiments - Journal of Research on Archaeometry
year 5, Issue 2 (2019)                   JRA 2019, 5(2): 105-115 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

1- Islamic Azad University of Tehran
2- Tarbiat Modares University ,
3- Islamic Azad University of Abhar
Abstract:   (2606 Views)
In archaeological survey of Iron Age of North and Northwest of Iran, the study of metal objects is of great importance because of their technical values. Based on archaeological findings of the first millennium BC, the use of metals in the plateau of Iran and other neighboring areas was spread dramatically. As in the Iron Age, a new phase in manufacturing of metal objects was emerged, recognizing the production methods are the important issues in the archaeology of this period. In fact, this Age is associated with the advancement of metal melting furnaces and the manufacturing of metal objects with fairly sophisticated methods. In the sites of Iron Age of Northwest of Iran, the metallurgy was carried out at an advanced level; while the development of the metallurgy tradition Age can be seen in different part of Iran. This diversity is based on metal objects and metal melting molds from the Iron Age sites of Northwest of Iran, especially from Hasanlu and Ziwiyeh, where most of them have high motifs and manufacturing technology, and also based on the metal objects in the Iron Age sites of Mazandaran region, where most of them have a simple shape and no decoration. It can be said that there is more complexity and diversity in the methods of making metal objects in the Iron Age sites of Northwest of Iran compared to that of the North regions of Iran. This research was done based on the analytical methods as well as the field and laboratory studies. The metal objects used in this research were collected from the archaeological excavation, kept in the store of national museum of Iran. After sampling for metallurgical testing, the samples were sent to the metallurgy and materials laboratory of Sharif University of Technology, where they have been studied by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) In this study, seven samples of metal objects were selected for metallography testing, which five of them were related to the Northwest of Iran and two others were related to the North region of Iran. The criterion that has been considered for the selection of the samples was that the discovered samples from the Northwest of Iran as well as metal mine and fuel recourses have been geographically close to each other. Based on the results obtained by metallographic testing and images taken by SEM, it was found that they have been manufactured mainly with two methods. Warm hammering and casting were the main methods of production of metal objects in the Iron Age sites in North and Northwest of Iran. On the hammered production method, a mechanical work such as forging has been done after casting. Therefore, their microstructure was different under the microscope. The metal objects discovered from the Iron Age of Mazandaran region compared to that of the Northwest of Iran sites, have a simple shape and manufacturing technology. This could be probably due to the existence of the most powerful empires such as Urartu and Manna in the vicinity of the Northwest region, and therefore more skilled metallurgist, artists and technologists in this region of Iran. All in all, the metal objects discovered from Iron Age sites of Northwest, especially Hasanlu, regarding the techniques and style of production, are more complex than that of the Iron Age sites of Mazandaran in the North of Iran, which have indigenous and local governance.
Full-Text [PDF 1447 kb]   (454 Downloads)    
Technical Note: Original Research | Subject: Archaeometry
Received: 2018/10/13 | Accepted: 2019/06/11 | Published: 2019/12/30 | ePublished: 2019/12/30

1. Talai H. Archaeology and Art of Iran in First Millennium BC. Tehran: Samt, 2006, 79-80. [in Persian] [طلايي حسن. باستان‌شناسی و هنر ايران در هزاره اول قبل از میلاد. تهران: انتشارات سمت، 1381، 80-79.]
2. Farokh F. Metallurgical industry in ancient Iran. J Coll Eng 1971, 2: 1-9. [in Persian] [فرحان فرخ. صنايع فلزي در ايران باستان. نشريه دانشكده فني دانشگاه تهران 1350،2: 29-25.]
3. Jafarii A. Microscopic Studies on Ancient Iron Objects Discovered From Archaeological Excavation North of Iran. Hamedan: Iranian Archaeological Research, 2017, 7(15): 131-147. [in Persian] [جعفری علیرضا. مطالعات میکروسکوپی بر روی اشیای آهنی باستانی به‌دست‌آمده از کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی شمال ایران. همدان: پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران1396، 7(15): 131-147.]
4. Majid Zadeh Y. Metal And Metalorgy In Ancient Iran. Tehran: Farhang 1985, 35-38. [in Persian] [مجيد زاده يوسف. فلز و فلزگري در ايران باستان. تهران: نشر نامه فرهنگ ايران 1364، 38-35.]
5. Pigott VC. The emergence of iron use at Hasanlu. Expedition 1989; 31: 67.
6. Tohidi N. The Revolution of Iron And Steel Production In Iran And The World. Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1985. [in Persian] [توحيدي ناصر. سير تكامل توليد آهن و فولاد در ايران و جهان. تهران: نشر اميركبير 1364.]
7. Dyson RH. Notes on weapons and chronology in northern Iran around 1000 BC. Nederlands historisch-archaeologisch instituut in het Nabije Oosten, 1964.
8. Abedini Araghi M. Report of Excavation In Shishar Tepe. Mazandaran, 2015. [in Persian] [عابديني عراقي مهدي. گزارش حفاري شيشار تپه. مازندران: سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری، 1394.]
9. Harris MV. Glimpses of an iron age landscape. Expedition 1989; 31: 12.
10. Badiei R. Conprehensiveran geography of Iran. 1983. [in Persian] [بدیعی ربیع. جغرافیای مفصل ایران. تهران: نشر اقبال. 1362.]
11. Burton‐Brown T. Azerbaijan ancient and modern. J R Cent Asian Soc 1949; 36: 168-177. [] [DOI:10.1080/03068374908731328]
12. Dyson RH. Rediscovering Hasanlu. Expedition 1989; 31: 3-11.
13. Dollfus G, Huff D, Bivar ADH, et al. Survey of Excavations in Iran-1976. Iran 1977; 15: 169-182. [] [DOI:10.2307/4300574]
14. Burney C. Excavations at Haftavān Tepe 1968: First Preliminary Report. Iran 1970; 8: 157-171. [] [DOI:10.2307/4299640]
15. Hejebri Nobari A. Preliminary Report of The Second Season of Excavation In Masjed Kabud Site. Tehran, 2000. [in Persian] [هژبري نوبري عليرضا. گزارش مقدماتي دومين فصل كاوش در محوطه باستاني مسجد كبود تبريز. تهران: سازمان ميراث فرهنگي كشور و مركز تحقيقات باستان‌شناسی دانشكده علوم انساني دانشگاه تربيت مدرس، 1379.]
16. Hejebri Nobari A. Preliminary Report of The Third Season of Excavation In Masjed Kabud Site. Tehran, 2001. [in Persian] [هژبري نوبري عليرضا. گزارش سومين فصل كاوش باستان‌شناختی محوطه باستاني مسجد كبود تبريز. تهران: پژوهش مشترك دانشكده علوم انساني دانشگاه تربيت مدرس و سازمان ميراث فرهنگي كشور، 1380.]
17. Sheikhi M. The Treasure of Zivieh. Tehran: Pazineh, 2014. [in Persian] [شيخي مهتا. آثار گنجينه زيويه. تهران: نشر پازينه، 1393.]
18. Mahfrouzi A. Report of Excavation In Gohar Tepe Iron Age Cemetery. Mazandaran, 2007. [in Persian] [ماهفروزي علي. گزارش حفاري گورستان عصر آهن گوهر تپه. مازندران: سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری، 1386.]
19. Abedini Araghi M. Report of Excavation In Lafurak Iron Age Cemetery. Mazandaran, 2005. [in Persian] [عابديني عراقي مهدي. گزارش حفاري گورستان عصر آهن لفورك. مازندران: سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری، 1384.]
20. Danti MD. Hasanlu V: The Late Bronze and Iron I Periods. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013. [] [DOI:10.9783/9781934536629]
21. Rabiee A. Metallography Laboratory. Tehran: Jazil, 2006. [in Persian] [افسانه ربیعی. آزمایشگاه متالوگرافی. تهران: نشر جزیل. 1385.]
22. Yavari F, Abbas Nejad R, Mortazavi M, et al. Metallographic Review SEM-EDS and ICP-OES of Bronze Age Three Alloy Objects Descovered from Southern of Halil-Rud Basin-Jiroft. Pazhohesh-Ha-Ye Bastanshenasi Iran 2015; 10: 67-82. [in Persian] [یاوری فاطمه، رحمت عباس نژاد، محمد مرتضوی، نادر علیدادی سلیمانی. بررسی متالوگرافی ICP-0ES و SEM-EDS سه شیء آلیاژی عصر مفرغ مکشوف از بخش جنوبی حوضه هلیل‏رود، جیرفت. همدان: پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران1394، 10: 67-82.]